Sign up for my email newsletter

Get new updates, usually once a week – it features long-form essays on what’s going on here in Silicon Valley.

I’ve written 550+ essays which have been featured and quoted in The New York Times, Fortune, Wired, and WSJ. The topics range from mobile product design to fundraising to “growth hacking.”

Thanks for reading. -Andrew

Close

@andrewchen

Subscribe · Featured · Recent essays

Benefit-Driven Metrics: Measure the lives you save, not the life preservers you sell

Measuring value created rather than optimizing for yourself
In my last blog post, I talked about the idea that value creation generates revenue, traffic, and other metrics, not the other way around. This is a particularly interesting idea to implement because it goes against much of the standard analytics reports that are out there.

The reason is that ultimately, most metrics tend to focus inwards, on self-interested gain, rather than outwards on the value you’re creating for your customers. Let’s take a couple examples of inward-focused metrics that people often cite:

  • account registrations
  • pageviews
  • unique visitors per month
  • revenues

I’m sure you measure many of the above, as I do as well. It’s OK to measure this stuff, but if you start to optimize for it, you are starting to focus on the business of value extraction, not value creation.

Measuring # of life preservers sold versus the # of lives saved
Thus we come back to the title of the post. Most people are using standard analytics packages that are commoditized to focus inwards on metrics like pageviews and revenue. To use an analogy, that’s akin to the idea of measuring the # of life preservers that you sell, and trying to optimize for that, rather than optimizing for the benefit, which is the # of lives saved.

If you focus primarily on selling life preservers, then you’ll tend to do all sorts of stuff like:

  • making them cheaper to build
  • adding doo-dads to them that are flashy to customers
  • using aggressive sales tactics
  • etc.

These things might generate revenue in the short to medium run, but if you prioritize this at the expense of actually delivering on the product benefit, then that’s a bad optimization in the long term.

Now contrast that to the idea of trying to save as many lives as possible. You might still want to make them as cheap as possible, so that every ship in the world can have as many of them as needed. You might still want to add upgrades to them, but only if they help save lives. etc. While these changes may be similar in execution, they are different in spirit than the changes you’d make when optimizing for sales.

Introducing “Benefit-Driven Metrics”
So ultimately to start this exercise, you should throw out all the standard metrics (conversion rates, pageviews, etc.) and just focus on one thing:

What are your customers measuring?

By looking at how they define value, then you get yourself aligned to them as closely as possible. Answering this question sets your company up for value creation, which then unlocks the ability to gain something from that value, then you have to start here.

I’ll deem these quantitative measurements as “Benefit-driven metrics.”

How do you measure it?
Here’s the interesting part – everyone’s benefit-driven metrics will be completely different, because most people’s customers and value proposition and product are ultimately very different. Unfortunately, you don’t have the crutch of standardized numbers like pageviews or uniques to lean on.

But let me give you some examples for reference:

For dating sites:
Why do customers join dating sites? To find their soulmates. Thus, measure the quantity of successful matches you make, not the lifetime value of the customer. Focusing on LTV can easily lead you to do things like creating fake accounts to make people come back, or optimizing it so that they find their best matches several months down the line, or trying to get everyone to pre-pay for the service rather than making the product experience awesome.

For marketplaces:
Why do customers sell on a marketplace? To make money and get rid of their stuff. Why do customers buy on a marketplace? So that they can get things cheaply and quickly, and are happy with their purchase. Thus, measure the quantity of how much your sellers take home, and how many buyers are happy with their experiences. Contrast this with overfocusing on listing fee revenues, which might get you into a spiral of raising prices rather than creating the best commerce experience.

For social networks:
Why do customers use social networks? To “connect” with their friends – let’s boil that down to communicating (though it’s obviously much richer than that). Then ideally, you might want to focus on the number of messages/comments/posts that end up getting replies from their friends. If you overfocus on something like user registrations, then you might get a ton of users, but maybe they won’t be getting to experience the benefits of the product.

For online publishers who sell to advertisers:
Why do advertisers buy ads on websites? To generate traffic to their own sites, which in turn leads to revenue. In this case, you should quantify the amount of revenue you generate for your advertiser customers, or at least the number of conversions they receive. Contrast this with the approach of measuring and optimizing your own CPMs as a publisher, which results in potentially delivering a lot of crappy traffic to advertisers who will drop their payments in the long term.

Special note for ad-driven startups :-)
Now ad-supported startups have a particularly interesting issue in this, because I keep using the words “benefits” and “customers” and perhaps it’d be easy to think this refers to the users of the product. But maybe not, as I’ve outlined before in Your ad-supported Web 2.0 site is actually a B2B enterprise in disguise. The reason is that your customer may actually be the advertiser on the site, not your user!

And in fact, if you overfocus on pleasing your users to the detriment of your advertiser customers, which is very easy – then that leads to very bad things.

Start this benefits-driven approach now, not later, so you can learn the right things
Finally, I want to emphasize that I believe it’s important to start thinking about these benefit-driven metrics from the beginning of your business, not later. The reason is that every learning that a startup makes is often hugely applicable to a specific context, but not at all applicable to other variations.

If you’re going to start a website that churns users like crazy but hits massive user goals, you will build an entire organization to optimize for those metrics. And once you’ve gone far on this, it’s not clear that you’ll have the DNA, the technology, the ideas, or the willpower to execute in a different direction.

Want more?
If you liked this post, please subscribe or follow me on Twitter. You can also find more essays here.

Like this post?
Get new updates via newsletter..

  • http://www.mvmpartners.com/blog scottshapiro

    Great post. I completely agree that in a B2B2C business, metrics must be optimized for benefit on both the advertiser conversion front (low cost, high quality traffic) and also customer benefit. However, I've found it tougher to measure customer benefit since it's often more of a qualitative metric rather than strictly a volume metric or ratio.

  • http://nabeel.typepad.com nabeel

    Man, I've got to get you to write my headlines. :)

    I'm reminded of a conversation with Sulka from Habbo about how one of the biggest predictors of whether a user was going to return to Habbo Hotel is whether they had human contact in their first visit. Didn't actually matter whether it was positive or negative, turns out the value they felt was the need for human interaction. Obviously, once they are directly measuring that, it changes how you view product development.

  • jonathan_FT

    Excellent read. I love the bit about marketplaces – especially in context with eBay's recent struggles. Disgruntled sellers & a hit-or-miss buying experience have led to their downward spiral. Reminds me of a post this morning from Best Buy's CMO, who quotes Robert Stephens (Geek Squad's founder) – “the easier you make it for customers to complain, the better your product will become.” That's a nice tie-in for this or a future article.

    Thanks for the always engaging content.

    Jonathan Robinson
    FreeTextbooks.com

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    Yes, measuring value proposition for consumers can definitely be difficult – but I think ultimately you have to take a stance on it, and have a strong opinion about what works or doesn't.

    For a search engine, you want to create a bunch of metrics that try to get at whether or not people found the result they were looking for.

    For dating, you want to figure out metrics that determine if people are having good dates, and find the right match.

    This is a hard problem overall, but either way, the number of users that YOU register is probably not the right one ;-)

    Etc.

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    Lonely, or so lonely:
    http://www.spike.com/video/team-america-world/2

    Figuring out the quantitative perspective to measure things like human loneliness is what consumer internet so fun ;-)

  • http://www.mvmpartners.com/blog scottshapiro

    Ageed, thanks Andrew! What techniques have you come across that get deeper into consumer value proposition? How does a product mgr or analyst determine if people are having good dates by using analytics data, for example?

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    The best case stuff is explicit data – so you want it to be easy to both give positive feedback and negative feedback.

    Thus:
    Positive = after a date, they get a followup where they can give you both quant/qual data about their experience. Or, they quit the service but because they found a match

    Negative = after a date, they vote negative, or quit and haven't found a match.

    You want to make it easy to quit your service and delete an account, because that's the strongest signal a user can give that your service sucks ;-) Same with unsubscribes from a mailing list.

  • http://www.mvmpartners.com/blog scottshapiro

    Great advice, thanks!

  • David

    Nice distinction.

  • http://ethanbloch.com ethan

    Thanks for fleshing this out. You are dead-on. However I do think a focus on both, the business of value extraction & value creation, is important. There are lots of ways to add/create value which may never translate into a profitable businesses. Finding that right mix (i.e. Walmart “everyday low prices, our margins are 3.5% but we move close to half a billion in product each year, so we're making bank”) is crucial to the long term viability of any business. Thoughts?

  • aassaf

    Fantastic!!!!

    I love that start-ups are starting to focus on making money and serving customers rather than losing money and serving boards. It is so easy to be myopic and forget about the customers who make the air you breath.

    I for one am glad I came across this post today and not tomorrow.

  • http://phantomcto.com/blog Vanessa, Phantom CTO

    @ethan, the balance between growing a company by inward metrics and growing the value created is something most start up business do have to consider but there isn't any single business leader that will sacrifice the lifeblood of the company for the sake of creating value in the marketplace.

    Andrew gave a great example of the life preserve, still selling and offering upsells while creating value by measuring lives saved. Those sales and upsells are critical to generating and improving revenue but among a sea of life preserve companies (corny,I know) so few are giving attention to creating value that they will stand apart from their competitors.

    When most companies have products or services that are commodities, the companies that measure and implement value creation are the ones that stand out in the industry and grow. Very few companies can move the volume that walmart can or offer as few color choices as Ford's first model T and still be successful in a commodity based business.

  • http://twitter.com/heatherkoyuk Heather Koyuk

    Thanks for the awesome article! This is great insight into the *right* way to do business (a concept which I feel very strongly about ;), and it provides a fresh perspective, a perspective that I hadn't thought of yet. Thanks!

  • Alex Popescu

    Andrew, this is a great article. Thanks for writing it.
    I'd suggest a small change though, in regards to online publishers. The real clients of online publishers are the readers/visitors. If the online publisher doesn't think so, the result is what we are currently seeing: everyone complaining about the ads market going down (or not growing as expected). Only after you are sure that you are serving your readers, you can start thinking about advertisers (and I do agree with what added value means for those).
    For readers, added value can mean a lot of things, from timely news to unique high quality content. You have to decide what you offer, learn and improve by watching your readers and make sure you deliver. Only then is time for serving advertisers, but *never forget your readers*.

  • partywedo

    Andrew, a very thought provoking post…
    I wonder how many emotional lives are saved with the current craze in VIRTUAL gift giving? I know that a lot of VC money and several start-ups are chasing the idea that an electronic image of a flower could bring friends some real-life support, but I wonder how supportive that really is.
    It seems that when the advertising life jacket supply shrunk in the economic slowdown, the social sites turned to these virtual gifts to keep themselves afloat.
    In the real world, family and friends support important life events by the giving of REAL gifts that they purchase thoughtfully, then wrap and deliver in kindness.
    We seem to be so caught up in building virtual life jackets that we are losing site of something that has worked for decades – something REAL.
    I wonder how many drowning friends would see the benefit-driven approach if and when we throw them an electronic image of a life preserver?
    Let's make the benefits real and we will probably save more lives.

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    Alex,
    I'll have to respectfully disagree with you that the customers of publishers are the readers. That's true for properties where the majority of the revenue comes from people actually buying the content, like Consumer Reports. But certainly not true where advertisers pay for the magazine to be written. I think there's a balance here, but I think advertisers are more important than anything else.

    Here's a scenario that proves my case – if you build an online property that has all international traffic, then no matter how much people love it, you won't find the advertising to support it.

  • Alex Popescu

    Andrew, I think we might be referring to different online publishing types, so I don't think there is really a disagreement between us. I do agree that for those online publishers paid for writing the magazine what you are saying is absolutely true, while I was referring more to those independent online publishers that are trying to monetize their content through advertising. And for this later case, I don't think I need to name a specific scenario as the media/internet is already full of them.

  • http://twitter.com/Guybendov Guy Bendov

    Thanks again Andrew for putting this issue clearly in front of startups and their boards.

    For me, you have got the priorities right. Yet, I do think that once you have an application out, measurements and optimization of “value creation” and “value extraction” have to be in parallel.

    The reason I say that is because I think one is a product management responsibility and the other is a marketing & sales responsibility.
    Further, since customers expectations and needs tend to change over time, both teams has got to be on top of customers' feedback and optimize accordingly.

    I believe that if you measure and optimize the product's customer's usage with the deriving inward facing usage results (as well as non deriving parameters such as new traffic where relevant) you may get better and better results and maximum overall value.

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    Good comments. I think the reason why most silicon valley startups focus on market share early on is because it's much harder to get to value creation at a massive scale than it is to figure out some ways of monetizing it.

    For example in Facebook's case, even though it's insanely hard to monetize social networks, they have enough scale that it's a matter of time before they hit $1B in revenue (in my opinion). It may take 5 years, but they'll get there.

  • guybendov

    In 1998, Yossi Vardi was quoted in BusinessWeek as saying, ''Creating revenue is a big distraction.”, meaning that you have to focus on a great product and traffic creation first and then figure how to make money off it.
    Not everyone can or want to agree, but this quote does support your post well :)

    1. Make sure you have a great value in your product for your users and (future) customers
    2. make sure you bring a lot of traffic and optimize its product-usage conversion
    If you can support that plan financially (like facebook) good for you, you have one less parameter to worry about, until you are ripe to hit major revenues.

  • http://www.shidonni.com guybendov

    In 1998, Yossi Vardi was quoted in BusinessWeek as saying, ''Creating revenue is a big distraction.”, meaning that you have to focus on a great product and traffic creation first and then figure how to make money off it.
    Not everyone can or want to agree, but this quote does support your post well :)

    1. Make sure you have a great value in your product for your users and (future) customers
    2. make sure you bring a lot of traffic and optimize its product-usage conversion
    If you can support that plan financially (like facebook) good for you, you have one less parameter to worry about, until you are ripe to hit major revenues.

Want more? Featured essays and book recommendations