Sign up for my email newsletter

Get new updates, usually once a week – it features long-form essays on what’s going on here in Silicon Valley.

I’ve written 550+ essays which have been featured and quoted in The New York Times, Fortune, Wired, and WSJ. The topics range from mobile product design to fundraising to “growth hacking.”

Thanks for reading. -Andrew

Close

@andrewchen

Subscribe · Featured · Recent essays

Does Silicon Valley noise detract from long-term value creation?

Encountering the Silicon Valley echochamber
I grew up in Seattle and worked there for many years, and finally moved to the Bay Area in 2007 because I wanted to be at the epicenter of the startup scene. When I was in Seattle, I always lamented the fact that there wasn’t a “scene” the way that the Bay Area has one. I used to talk about it as one of the big negatives of the region, since you didn’t have the density of events, bloggers, and general activity in Seattle as in the Bay.

Now that I’ve been here for a few years, it’s clear to me that the Silicon Valley echochamber has its clear negatives as well. Being out of touch with the average American consumer is one obvious negative. Chasing down technological rabbit holes is another.

But I believe one especially strong issue is the constant peer reinforcement from fellow entrepreneurs to be working on stuff that everyone deems “hot” or easily relatable. And how easy it feels to be left behind when there’s a “hot new trend” in a particular direction, even when there’s obviously many good markets to be explored at any given time. I would argue that this strong peer reinforcement from fellow entrepreneurs makes it easy to focus on very short-term successes, and ignore long-term contrarian bets.

Peer reinforcement from fellow entrepreneurs
One of the most common conversations you’ll overhear at any startup event is one entrepreneur giving another entrepreneur their elevator pitch. Or, you’ll overhear an entrepreneur giving their pitch to a prospective startup engineer. In fact, I would argue that many startups spend more time talking to other people “in the know,” than they do potential customers, whether those startup savvy people are investors, job candidates, fellow entrepreneurs, advisors.

And just as similarly, a common conversation you’ll overhear is the equivalent of the “hot tip” on a stock – but instead, the conversation will be about a particular market or company. Oh, did you hear that company so-and-so is doing X million in revenue? Oh, the Y space is blowing up.

All of these conversations, as insular, belly-gazing discussions establishing the social pecking order at any given time, provide quick feedback about the entire startup ecosystem. It’s what guides the decisions of many employees or investors to dive deeply into the “hot” markets. In many ways, this is one of the deep strengths of Silicon Valley, that the information is so efficient, and new markets can be quickly identified and exploited by dozens of companies simultaneously.

Copy cats galore
At the same time, these conversations can easily reinforce the feeling for many entrepreneurs that “You’re missing out!” It causes many people to look at the sectors that seem to be immediately doing well, and jump into them as copycats, because it looks like easy money. There’s nothing like the feel of a gold rush to make everyone go nuts.

Interestingly enough, many of these copycats are only in it to exploit the short-term advantages of the market, and some are self-admittedly not passionate about the area they go into. In particular with this economy, a long-time mentor described it as “Silicon Valley’s version of quitting your idealistic startup and going back to work at Microsoft” – meaning potentially soulless activities that generate revenue, regardless of actual passion or long-term belief in the projects as viable businesses.

Focusing on the long-term
As an entrepreneur, I can’t help but look at the short-term choices that get made in an environment like this without some degree of disappointment. There are many brilliant people who could be trying to make the world for the better and really create long-term value, but instead they are engaged in a zero-sum game to extract as much value as possible from the world. Now perhaps as a market, these startups will collectively make the world a better place – such is the wonder of markets – but at the same time, it disturbs my sense of idealism about entrepreneurship.

More importantly, building a startup takes years no matter what the economic environment – maybe 5, maybe more. And if you’re going to be stuck doing something for 5 years or more, then you might as well pick something you’re really excited about. Taking a long-term view, I think, means accepting that many of these new markets will significantly change over time, possibly merge with other markets, or possibly turn out to be too small.

It’s worth thinking about what kind of company you want to be in 5 or more years, rather than just grabbing onto whatever trend seems to be floating by at the moment.

Staying focused on the long-term
So how do you stay focused on the long-term, when there’s so much noise? Here are a couple thoughts for you:

Stop reading blogs so damn much
Every once in a while, I’m busy enough that I don’t read any blogs for a week or so at a time, and you know what? The world doesn’t end ;-) Obviously it’s useful to keep up with how the rest of the tech industry is moving, and where the markets are developing, but clearly there’s a diminishing returns to the minutiae around the startup word.

Have a strong vision that’s flexible yet specific
Another issue is how easily small companies are swayed when the vision is not clearly defined and understood. It’s easy, when internal values and vision haven’t been set, to follow the customer to wherever they would like to go. Or to fast-follow whatever is the darling startup at the moment, or to be swayed by competitor moves. So you need something that’s specific enough to figure out how much external data to incorporate, but also be flexible enough that if you hit contrary data, your entire startup’s core thesis doesn’t fall apart. The tension of the two is what makes this a challenge!

Ignore the competition
For most startups, the market is not clearly defined enough to also have clearly defined competition. In most cases, you’re better off focusing on your customer and learning from them both quantitatively and qualitatively, rather than emulating what your competitors are doing. And in particular, if you are extracting a ton of interesting knowledge about your customer, you may end up with a unique set of insights that would beat whatever you’d get from copying anyway.

Don’t go to startup events
Another common environment where you’re compelled to pitch your startup over and over is startup events. Skip these, and you’ll find yourself thinking more independently from other entrepreneurs.

Forgo short-term opportunities if they are clearly short-term
One very difficult challenge is that along the road to success, there will be many tempting rabbit holes to go down. Many ideas are hard to scale into larger businesses, but make a ton of sense at a smaller scale. Many ideas are also unsustainable, as a hole closes in the market, or because customers don’t get enough long-term value. Of course, sorting out long-term from short-term is the difficult part here.

Move down to the Peninsula, not the city
One of the small geographical differences that exist between the city and the peninsula is that there are far more media-oriented, hipster entrepreneurial engineers in San Francisco compared to Palo Alto, Mountain View, etc. As a result, the city is a fun place to get your company started, as there’s ample idea exchange between all your fellow entrepreneurs. On the other hand, once you get going with your startup, the sheer number of parties, get-togethers, and coffee meetings can get overwhelming.

Be skeptical of opportunities that are both hot, and easy
The most interesting opportunities I hear are ones that appear to be easy revenue, and I hear about them from multiple sources. Many of these opportunities are the equivalent of windows of arbitrage that appear in the stock market – they’ll quickly be closed, and never appear again.

Remember that you only need one big success
The final point I’ll make is that at least as far as startups go, you really only need to find one awesome line of attack on a market, and that’s it. Maybe that takes a month to find, or maybe it takes years. But ultimately, if you are making forward progress on your business and you reach a huge market eventually, it doesn’t matter much what happens between now and then. In this way, having a great deal of patience is very useful if you can systematically discover high-quality, long-term opportunities. This may be harder than the short-term stuff, but it also creates the ability to become a category-defining company.

Want more?
If you liked this post, please subscribe or follow me on Twitter. You can also find more essays here.

UPDATE: Thanks to Marc for reminding me about startup events and peninsula living also!

Like this post?
Get new updates via newsletter..

  • Name

    Andrew, great post. I left the Silicon Valley 2 years ago and can attest to most of what you say.

    Quick question – I agree that you need to stop focusing on your competition, but what value would you put on observing how your target customer uses your competition's product?

  • http://www.helpyard.com/ HelpYard

    Given your perspective of Seattle vs Silicon Valley – do you think that you would get more opportunities to talk to 'real' potential customers in Seattle? Would spending time in both be ideal from the perspective of getting a balanced dose of entrepreneur-chat vs potential-customer-chat?

    (I ask because I'm currently in the UK but have an opportunity to spend some time in Seattle)

  • http://kortina.net kortina

    The link at the bottom of this post, “please subscribe,” led me here: http://andrewchenblog.com/2009/07/27/subscribe/ which appears to be a broken page.

    BTW, I really enjoyed this post.

  • dasil003

    Too true, I resisted moving to Silicon Valley for years because I was simultaneously put off by the echo chamber and a little intimidated by the amount of talent I'd be competing with. However after joining a startup a couple years ago I found out that A) there are plenty of real people in silicon valley and B) as much as the Valley attracts the best and brightest in tech, it also attracts a proportionate amount of people who aren't that good at all (although they'll probably end up being better than they would have if they had looked for a safe corporate job). At the end of the day I think the Valley is really only a huge advantage if you are looking for venture capital. Otherwise I think any major market will have enough talent if you really are as good as you think.

  • rahimthedream

    as a fellow transplant from the pacific northwest who came out here about the same time as you: i feel the same way, and ive been lamenting this issue recently more and more. get out and meet your customers people!
    great post andrew and thx for keepin it real :)

  • TedHoward

    Excellent analysis of Silicon Valley. As you know, I moved here a year ago, also from Seattle.
    One of the unsettling observations I have had was employees going into industries not because they would enjoy working in that industry but because it's trendy. I'm more used to someone being a bioinformatics engineer because they're interested in bioinformatics, not because VC's starting making public comments about it and a big funding deal was made.
    Some great stuff does come out of the chaos though.

  • http://rahmin.com rahmin

    andrew, great post. i've often looked at the companies coming out of NYC and thought that the scene there was less dominated by the echo-chamber and more connected to customers and people at large than what we have in SF. could be the grass is always greener though…

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    I think it's all a tradeoff ;-) You need to be somewhere that, if you want to get wade into the tech scene, it's really easy. But if you want to shut the door and get some work done, you can do that too.

    All things being equal, I think the bay area is great – I just wouldn't try to get too deep into what other startups are doing.

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    I think it's important to understand all aspects of your customers – so if they group you in with another product, it'd good to understand why and how you compare. But that being said, as a startup it's often easy to change markets to pick out a different position within a market, so it's not that important to over-follow competitors imho.

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    Does it still happen for you? The link is supposed to go to http://andrewchenblog.com/subscribe. Works for me in Safari though.

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    What browser are you using, etc.?

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    I don't think you can overstate the advantages that Silicon Valley has over other regions in terms of advisors, potential employees, venture capital, and general tech know-how. So all of those things makes me very happy to be based here. It's just in addition to these advantages, it's easy to get caught up in the disadvantages!

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    Yes – and I think that employees choosing to do something just because it's a hot startup rather than being in their passion area is a huge problem! It's just not long-term thinking, and every startup will go from hot to not in a matter of time, and if all your people then decide to leave then, you haven't built up a lot of loyalty.

  • http://kortina.net kortina

    Seems to work now. I use Safari.

  • http://www.dataspora.com/blog Michael Driscoll

    Talking about entrepreneurship is like talking about dieting. You can buy books, listen to gurus, sign up for classes — but ultimately, success requires sweat.

  • http://twitter.com/avirani Aamir Virani

    Preach on brother Andrew, preach on.

  • http://www.passpack.com/ Tara Kelly

    Timely post. I'm considering moving from an even further off point than Seattle. I'd be interested in your opinion on startup hubs like Plug N Play and the like. Are these as insta-communities… or is it like going to startup events?

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    I personally prefer lots of deep 1:1 interaction instead – basically soliciting advice from people who have a deep understanding of both your business and the space. Being in a workspace environment with other startups might be worse, actually – it might be like hanging around a startup conference 24×7

  • cianchette

    Great post Andrew. I met Warren Buffett a few years ago and he said that part of his success was due to working outside of New York City. Making decisions in Omaha allowed him to be more independent and to avoid the latest financial fads.

  • jasonwatkinspdx

    Well said.

    I think most startup folks would voice agreement with this… but I think it's far more difficult to put into practice. The fear of being left behind is powerful. When something new appears it can be difficult if not impossible to determine if it has long term value as well.

    I think all one can do is apply a professional poker mentality: ignore what cards come and whether you win or lose. Focus on your thought process: did you think through all the branches of the decision tree? Did you estimate the probabilities accurately? Be dissatisfied when you win by luck: find your mistake and address it, just as you would after losing by a clearly wrong choice.

    But also aside from over used metaphors, if you're carefully observing yourself and your customers (ideally empirically where you can) I think that you gain confidence as a defense against the noise: who cares what other people are doing when you've got your own course plotted.

  • http://www.zoscomm.com jonziskind

    Andrew -

    Great post. I am a member of a Southern Cal startup and we spend a great deal of time in Silicon Valley. Always get the same thing – you should have your company here. I always leave feeling that there is an incredible group of people there, but we need to keep our company focused on the long term vision. Really build a sustainable long-term technology company from which many things can grow. So, thanks for your timely post.

  • http://andrewchen.typepad.com Andrew Chen

    Yet I'm sure that Warren Buffett likely appreciated the time he spent in NY when he graduated, etc. I think you need to be in a position to have access to the right relationships if you want them, but focus on staying independent otherwise.

  • http://twitter.com/glenlipka glenlipka

    Great post. It made me think about what happens when you start selling. The bay area business community is much more willing to buy your new service/product because they are fellow travelers and innovators. So you might even see real economic success (initially) from the locals, but then struggle when you try to “cross the chasm”.

    It's terribly important to measure sales success with and without the Bay Area or risk hitting a brick wall after you saturate the innovators.

    However, to flip-flop a bit: According to Seth Godin, you should go after the sneezers, who also live in the Bay Area.

    Ultimately, building a great product is a prerequisite to success. Just don't believe your own press releases.

  • http://twitter.com/johncass John Cass

    Andrew, interesting article, I moved to the bay area in 1995, and in those days people told me that San Francisco was not really a tech town, it was only after the late 90's that a lot of tech people moved into the city. Before that the pay rates for tech people was good because all of the tech people were in San Jose and Palo Alto.

    Interesting to hear the current state of the area. I moved to Seattle in '97, and I'm now in Boston, the second biggest tech center in the country. After living in three big tech areas. It seems to me that Boston and Silicon Valley are closest in character compared to Seattle. Boston and Silicon Valley's growth has been organic, while Seattle's tech community had to be cultivated much more with something like the WSA.

  • http://www.networkmarketingsuccess.ws mlgreen8753

    That image is too funny…you should submit it to Adwido.

  • http://devin.reams.me/ Devin Reams

    Great post, Andrew. Well put. Do you have any intention to get back 'out' of the scene? Go back to Seattle, perhaps?

  • ericknudtson

    Great Post! Thank you!

  • jeff from pittsburgh

    Thanks for validating what I already believed.

    It feels pleasurable. Like dopamine!

  • jeff from pittsburgh

    Thanks for validating what I already believed.

    It feels pleasurable. Like dopamine!

  • http://twitter.com/agrinaker Andrew Grinaker

    Great post. I recently left a startup in Seattle and there is plenty of useless noise up here in the Great NW. People love to hear themselves talk and make sure people are listening.

Want more? Featured essays and book recommendations