Sign up for my email newsletter

Get new updates, usually once a week – it features long-form essays on what’s going on here in Silicon Valley.

I’ve written 550+ essays which have been featured and quoted in The New York Times, Fortune, Wired, and WSJ. The topics range from mobile product design to fundraising to “growth hacking.”

Thanks for reading. -Andrew

Close

@andrewchen

Subscribe · Featured · Recent essays

Quora: Has Facebook’s DAU/MAU always been ~50%?

I recently asked, and then answered my own question on Quora and wanted to share here as well.

Has Facebook’s DAU/MAU always been ~50%?

According to public info, Facebook’s DAU/MAU is 58% these days. Here’s a link.

It states:

  • 901 million monthly active users at the end of March 2012
  • 526 million daily active users on average in March 2012

Has Facebook’s DAU/MAU always been this good, as a consequence of its product category (communication/photo-sharing/etc.)? Or was it once a lot worse and was improved over time?

(UPDATE: Here’s a followup question I have about the same topic- Was Facebook’s DAU/MAU ~50% prior to launching the Newsfeed in 2009?)

Answer: Yes, Facebook’s DAU/MAU has been close to 50%, at least since 2009.

Since the DAU/MAU data is only available since 2009, it’s hard to say how things were very early on. However, I theorize that Facebook’s high DAU/MAU has always been high as a natural outcome of the communication-oriented usage of the product. Contrast this to a product category like ecommerce which you are unlikely to use and purchase with every day.

In their recent financial filings, the following chart is shown for Facebook’s DAU and MAU since 2009:

If you do a graph of the DAU/MAU on this data, since 2009, you’ll see that it starts around 45-47% and goes up to a very impressive 58% recently.

(As an aside, another interesting aspect is that Facebook’s MAU growth looks pretty much like a straight line, and so the % growth has been slowing down as of late. The MAU growth was around 23% starting in 2009, but is now down to 6-7% in recent months. See below for a graph on MAU vs % MAU growth)

Like this post?
Get new updates via newsletter..

  • http://jasoncrawford.org/ jasoncrawford

    Actually, I would guess that their DAU/MAU ratio went way up after they introduced News Feed. Before that it was probably well under 50%.

  • http://andrewchenblog.com Andrew Chen

    My guess is that it’s always been high- same way that email/IM/chat have high DAU/MAUs even though they don’t have feeds per se. It’s all about communication. Maybe it’s not as high as 50%, but maybe like 30 or 40%. But not 10%, which is where a lot of sites are (ecommerce, reference, etc.)

  • http://www.wisestep.com/ WiseStep

     hmmmm it always been 50`

  • http://jasoncrawford.org/ jasoncrawford

    Yeah, but *was* it all about communication, before the News Feed? I don’t think it was.

  • http://andrewchenblog.com Andrew Chen

    I did just get a reply on my second Quora question from someone at FB in ’06 who said that it was 40-50% back in the day. Hopefully more responses soon. But yeah, I think it was writing on walls and that’s what drove things, even back in the day.

  • http://twitter.com/marycray Mary

    Great analysis, Andrew. I wonder if without Zynga (or any casual games) how FBs average DAU and MAU metrics hold up.  ”As of May 2012, Zynga’s games on Facebook have over 250 million monthly active users.” (source: Wikipedia). I’m curious to see three years from now (an eternity, it seems) when Zynga’s exclusivity with Facebook expires what will happen.

  • http://twitter.com/chrisamccoy Chris McCoy

    News feed is most important feature for LTV, viral photo tagging for CaC.

    Photo tagging not so viral anymore, but news feed: web and news feed: mobile are now significantly important to drive DAUs. 

    Now that communications network is largely in place, I imagine not only will photos continue to become prominent, but Facebook will re-do their video app and premium/long-form content will start to stream through the newsfeed.

  • http://twitter.com/excapite Nigel Scott

    A question worth exploring but can I suggest that daily user engagement offers far more insight when mapped against ARPU.

    What I did some time back was map Daily Activity by Revenues for Facebook vs SMS vs Twitter vs Google vs email. Needless to say both SMS and Google’s model was significantly more efficient than the Facebook model.

    The results can be found here https://excapite.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/twitter-vs-sms-vs-facebook-vs-email-in-2010/

    I subsequently found that the compound metric of Average Revenue per Minute of (user) Engagement (or ARPMOE) to be of even more value.

    For example ARPMOE reveals Google to be 10x times more efficient than Facebook in 2011. Again the analysis can be found here http://excapite.blogspot.com/2011/09/new-facebook-experience-needs-new.html

Want more? Featured essays and book recommendations