Sign up for my email newsletter

Get new updates, usually once a week – it features long-form essays on what’s going on here in Silicon Valley.

I’ve written 550+ essays which have been featured and quoted in The New York Times, Fortune, Wired, and WSJ. The topics range from mobile product design to fundraising to “growth hacking.”

Thanks for reading. -Andrew

Close

@andrewchen

Subscribe · Featured · Recent essays

Is your market actually big? Or is it a fake market?

Every entrepreneur wants to believe their product is taking on a big market. Sometimes they’re kidding themselves.

If they are making something fun, they’ll say- “we’re competing against TV! The market is huge!” If they are making something utilitarian and functional, they’ll say, “everyone wants to save time- there’s millions of people who want that!” Or worse, they’ll combine two products that have big markets – Facebook and eBay, let’s say – and think “FB is huge, and eBay is huge, so a social network for auctioneers would also be huge!”

This is lazy, fuzzy thinking.

The reason why it’s useful to target big markets is that there’s pre-built demand for your product category. This makes growth and customer acquisition much, much easier. When customers understand your product category, and then your job can be to define why it wins versus the competition, rather than educating your customers on why need it in the first place. The negative is that you have a bunch of direct competition and an already established axis for how people will evaluate your product’s desirability. But that’s OK, entrepreneurs love to compete with big, slow companies right?

The “What kind of X do you use?” test
IMHO, here’s the best test of a big market- you’d ideally be able to go to 10 customers in your market segment and ask, “what kind of X do you use?” and the majority of them would be able to answer the question directly, showing a clear grasp of what X is. If you ask people, “What kind of car do you use?” they will know. Ask a sales professional “What kind of CRM do you use?” and they will also know, even if they say “we use an excel spreadsheet.”

If they say, “huh? What’s that?” then you’re in an imaginary market. Or the kinder way to say it- you’re in a “new market,” which sounds better than to say that there’s no market for your product.

An even stronger signal is when they know the label for a product category, like “car” “CRM” “browser” “phone” rather than the functional description “get you from A to B” “track your customers” etc. This is an even stronger signal that there’s a real, established market and customers know what they want to buy. If you have to explain what the category is as part of your question, then it means they still may not get it. A further improvement is then if they know the name of the product category, can tell you about the different products, and how they compare to each other. For example, if you asked me about “fast food restaurants” I could name you a whole bunch and tell you about McDonald’s versus Taco Bell versus something else. And that opens up the opportunity to also introduce a new “healthy fast food restaurant” which could be an entrant to the market.

The electronic version to do this “What kind of X do you use test” is to use Google Keywords Tool and see if a bunch of people are searching for your category. This isn’t to help generate SEO, it’s to help validate that people even know how to talk about what you’re doing. You’ll see that, for instance, a product like “blog” has 10s of millions of searches, which means millions of people understand what a blog is.

I also wrote a more detailed post a year ago about using the Google Keywords Tool for market research, for anyone interested in additional reading.

Want to tap into something people already know they need?
Remember that the first telephones were called “speaking telegraphs” and the first cars were called “horseless carriages.” No matter how important those inventions ultimately came to be, initially they had to conform to what customers expected. Only until a few years could they establish their own product category and competitive dimensions.

The other datapoint that has to be mentioned here is Apple. They helped convince me that reinventing a category is just as important as inventing a new one- while it can be a great feeling to bring something completely new to the world, Apple showed that you can be extremely innovative by taking products like laptops, MP3 players, smartphones, music software, etc., and upgrade them so much that it unlocks a whole new category for people. So for those who think that taking on an existing product category is tantamount to cloning, just try to improve an existing product as much as Apple does, and you’ll get somewhere.

The whole point of this post is: Start sizing a market based on what your target customer understands. If they don’t understand what your product is, and how it stacks up against substitute products, be honest with yourself: You’re in a new market. This means a whole different set of strategies and tactics for how to introduce your product. Start by figuring out where you are, and the rest will be a lot easier.

Like this post?
Get new updates via newsletter..

  • kgosser

    Loved this article, Andrew. I’m really glad I stumbled across your blog a few months ago. Since then, each new posting has been fantastic, and I’ve enjoyed rummaging through your archives. Keep it up!

  • http://www.linkedin.com/profile/edit?trk=hb_tab_pro_top Russell Himelein

    solid post. Definitely agree that before planning ANYTHING you need to first understand yourself/entity. Couldn’t stop thinking about the enterprise start up space while reading this. From Yammer to Podio to google docs/apps to Wizehive to Box.net to Salesforce…all seem to be at some stage of effectively explaining to target customers what they do & the value vs legacy system incumbents. I still don’t think anyone has hit the nail on the head. Would love to hear your thoughts on these “horseless carriage” startups attacking the enterprise space.

  • http://zackyap.com/ Zack Yap

    Great post.
    Any chance on elaborating on strategies and tactics for hitting a new market?

  • http://andrewchenblog.com Andrew Chen

    Save yourself the time and effort- skip new markets :)

  • http://zackyap.com/ Zack Yap

    Yeap. Definitely easier being able to explain through a label for a product category or an existing use case.

    The last time I tried explaining I was in a new market, the only explanation that worked was a demo. Even then, it wasn’t the best way to explain a product to someone new to it.

  • http://twitter.com/elliotmyhre Elliot Myhre

    Great post! It definitely has me thinking about a couple of things I am working on now. But ultimately, if an entrepreneur is so bold to try to create a new market (which is clearly more risky), isn’t it reasonable to expect, if successful, that the return will be representative of the risk?

  • wanda777

    @andrewchen: The way to (marketing) create your reference space
    Vertical lead generation model, this model is still viable in emerging foreign language digital markets (Europe industrialised countries with pop over 50m) one / two (max) keyword TDL’s can be secured for low equitable costs. example autoinsurance lifeinsurance home insurance carsales motosales each url is authoritative & specific to the root domain, each supports the new brand aggregate platform. Verticals are one of the few ways to compete long term with established brand deep pockets & Google whilst developing a new brand presence.Make sure that the platform can flex based on the business differences between the sites. This will give you the flexibility to make each site tailored to its distinct niche while at the same time having one platform that serves (and persists) the common elements.
    Google’s current penalty regime is directed against EMD sites with affiliate links and adsense which are primarily ‘low quality.’ a war against affiliate marketers, the Google mantra has never changed Good vertical examples / Amazon’s = Quidsi / Bankrate com = CreditCards….. Quinstreet com = CarIncurance AutoInsurance ….. but the cost securing TLD’s in the English language is a heavy burden to carry. Your views Andrew ?

  • http://twitter.com/Oscar33063 Oscar Almeida

    Good post Andrew,
    Sometimes I find myself stuck with the crowd running for the same wrong market. I realize it later and feel foolish from the time wasted.
    Reading your article gets those cells working in my cranium again, thanks for the help.
    by Oscar Almeida

  • http://www.facebook.com/bergethon Kriss Bergethon

    So if people subscribe to this way of thinking, how would the car, CRM or iPods ever have been invented? If all we do is compete in existing markets, how is anything ever created? The only way to compete in existing markets is to gain an edge in price or quality and its a great way to get poor quickly. Entrepreneurs should create markets, after careful testing and listening to the ‘new market’. And, with all due respect, please ignore the advice of the author. Go out and create new products, new space, new markets; its what makes entrepreneurship truly great.

Want more? Featured essays and book recommendations