Sign up for my email newsletter

Get new updates, usually once a week – it features long-form essays on what’s going on here in Silicon Valley.

I’ve written 550+ essays which have been featured and quoted in The New York Times, Fortune, Wired, and WSJ. The topics range from mobile product design to fundraising to “growth hacking.”

Thanks for reading. -Andrew

Close

@andrewchen

Subscribe · Featured · Recent essays

Polite growth

In every startup’s pursuit of growth, it’s important to remember that first and foremost we’re looking to create something that’s sustainable. Building something big and impactful takes years, and your distribution strategy will need to weather the passage of time. If you slash and burn your customers, your platform, or your product design, it’s a matter of time before your active users curve jumps the shark.

This means that your growth strategy has to be “polite” and be considerate of all the parties involved:

Customer-friendly
If people love your product, it’ll growth more quickly and be more viral. Ultimately if you put the same viral mechanics on a photo-sharing product versus a tax returns-sharing product, the former will always do better because no one wants to share their tax returns, not even presidential candidates. Tapping into an emotional desire to share and communicate is a prerequisite for building a long-term product.

Don’t try to force people to do what they don’t want to do, all in the first session. You’ll burn out your audience, fail to retain an active userbase, and while that might look good in the first few months, over time your churn will beat your growth rate. That leads to a rapid decline, which you don’t want.

Platform-friendly
This decade has been amazing for platforms. 20 years ago, it was just Windows. Today, you can build for iOS, Android, Facebook, Twitter, and many other emerging platforms are coming out. Each platform wants something different from you, and you have to learn to play by the rules to have a lasting relationship with them.

Obviously this means you can’t burn their users – that’s the worst thing to do. Dumb, too. Some platforms want more engagement and user-generated content, and others want ad revenues. Learn what it is that they want, and make sure your product helps them as much as it helps you.

Product-friendly
And finally, it’s important that your growth mechanics don’t compromise the design of your product. When you first started writing your product, I’m sure there were big aspirations about what it could do and what good it would ultimately accomplish for the world. Halfway along the way, when it’s time to work on marketing and growth, it can be easy to overreact and compromise your core design. Products meant for classy audiences suddenly turn into quiz apps. Ultimately, to stay excited about your product over the course of years, it’s gotta stay in a sweet spot – you can’t let growth destroy that.

There’s a lot more I want to write about on getting sustainable growth- everything from how to use A/B testing not to make a number go up, but how to make a number stay unchanged while you iterate on the feature qualitatively. I’d also like to write about the quantitative effect of overusing notifications because spam tests well short-term, but destroys your response rates long-term. Those, and many other topics, coming up soon.

Also, if you’re interested, I’ve written before about the importance of balancing growth and other factors in previous posts: You don’t need a growth hacker, How do I balance user satisfaction versus virality?, When does high growth not imply product/market fit?, and Know the difference between data-informed and data-driven.

 

Like this post?
Get new updates via newsletter..

  • http://twitter.com/buildtracks buildtracks.com

    Nice post Andrew. It seems like there are a lot of new businesses only focused on rapid growth in terms of users. Perhaps with the end goal of being acquired… Do you think this will change and new business owners will look more for “sustainable growth”?

  • http://petegrif.tumblr.com/ Pete Griffiths

    “I’d also like to write about the quantitative effect of overusing notifications…”

    Very tricky topic. Be interested to hear your thoughts.

  • wanda777

    IMO in world markets you can be toooo complex. Establish & Protect your reference frame.
    Future shock, infact, is culture lag, that is, the failure to notice what’s happening in the present. (Marshall McLuhan)

  • http://giffconstable.com giffc

    Some of the companies deemed a success in the last half-decade have done decidedly impolite growth – zynga possibly being the biggest example, but by far not alone. Unfortunately this behavior is rewarded via m&a exit and the situation gets publicly polished as success… The investors and founders make money, it becomes easy for the founders to raise new money, and it becomes the mode to aspire to especially on Silicon Valley. I like Jason Cohen’s (asmartbear) attempt this week to pop a bit of this hot air, although I think the incentives and mythology are so deeply ingrained I’m not sure it will change anything.

  • http://twitter.com/cataloniadg catalonia

    Would be really interested to hear your thoughts on the “polite” use of push notifications… specially around how to determine the right frequency, how to adapt frequency/type to customer’s engagement etc. I suspect that A/B testing might be the only way to figure this out for the individual use case but would be curious to know what others have discovered…

Want more? Featured essays and book recommendations