@andrewchen

Get the newsletter · 2018 essays (PDF) · Featured · Recent

What is your W2SAT* score? (*Web 2.0 Startup Aptitude Test)

I guest blogged on my friend Noah Brier’s blog while he was out traveling, and wrote the article below. I included it in its entirety, except for my bio. In general, Noah is a great NYC-based marketing guy, and I’d encourage you to check out his blog.

Guest blog by Andrew Chen, who also writes at Futuristic Play.

Are you a Web 2.0 startup founder? Many of the skills required to make a "typical" Web 2.0 company are becoming more and more well-defined. So let’s talk about what it takes, and rate your skillset and knowledge.

Read on if:

  1. You are building a consumer-facing site that…
  2. … acquires users virally and…
  3. … is free to use, and …
  4. … makes money through advertising.

With that in mind, I present the W2SAT – the Web 2.0 Startup Aptitude Test – a collection of rough questions about the consumer internet space – it should help you identify the areas you know really well, and the abilities you might want to develop further. This test is really for potential founders of Web 2.0 startups, and is not a general knowledge test for how often you read Techcrunch :)

One caveat: This test is for fun :) And in fact, even if you have a low score in areas, the real test is how well you adapt and learn.

With those excuses in place, please answer the following questions:

The Web 2.0 Startup Aptitude Test

1. Can you make something useful?

  • Do you build websites and/or write code?
  • Have you gone through a full cycle of creating and shipping a product?
  • Do you know how to launch a simple, core experience in less than a month?
  • Are you exposed to new company ideas every day through blogs, people, etc.?
  • Have you interviewed users and/or conducted usability tests to iterate on concepts?

2. Can you get users?

  • Have you bought users through advertising before?
  • Do you know how to optimize signup landing pages?
  • Do you have the relationships to get your company into major blogs and publications?
  • Have you employed organic user acquisition tactics successfully? (viral/SEO/etc.)
  • Do you know what metrics to use to measure retention, stickiness, viral, etc?

3. Can you make money?

  • Have you used AdSense/YPN/etc to monetize a site?
  • Do you know the difference between CPM, CPC, and CPA?
  • When you have a free+subscriptions model, do you know a typical subscription %?
  • Do you know the typical CPM for social media sites?
  • Have you ever sold a sponsorship deal to another company?

4. Can you handle all the business overhead?

  • Have you ever incorporated a company?
  • Do you have a mentor that has already done what you aim to do?
  • Have you sold or partnered with another business before?
  • Have you ever interviewed, hired, or managed people?
  • Have you ever persuaded anyone to invest in a company?

Great! Keeping track?

So where are you?

  • 0-4 points: You might be great in one area, or be an early generalist – try to learn faster!
  • 5-9 points: You might be a first-time entrepreneur – here’s a great opportunity to partner with someone with complementary strengths
  • 10-14 points: Awesome sweet spot – you know what you know, and also know what you don’t know. You’d be a great co-founder or early employee. Email me! (voodoo [at] gmail [dot] com)
  • 15+ points: Stop reading this blog, you aren’t learning anything :)

Again, wherever you are, it’s a starting point. In particular, it’s a good way to learn what you are good at, and potentially find someone else who is good at the other stuff.

What profile are you?
Let’s do some analysis. There are a couple typical profiles of people out there that you might fit in:

Independent consultant/designer/programmer:
If you’re a independent player, you are probably quite good on managing your own little small business building products, so you’ll be strong on part 1 and 4. Sometimes you won’t have to worry about getting users or making money through ads, since you’re not working on your own products, so 2 and 3 will be weaker.

People with big company resumes:
Big company folks might be great at products, managing overhead, and making money, but because they are tapping into existing cash cows, the actual traffic acquisition process can be difficult. So part 1 might be pretty good (although somewhat overspecialized or abstracted), part 2 will be pretty weak, and part 3 and 4 might be reasonably good.

MBAs with banking/consulting backgrounds:
Without operational experience, a "pure" business guy might have a hard time. In particular, although they might have great relationships, be very polished, and be good at business development, the other skills can be lacking. So typically part 1 and 2 might be pretty weak, with making money possibly higher, and part 4 the highest.

Typical startup employees:
Depending on the stage of the startup, an employee at an early company might be pretty balanced across all 4 parts. The reason is that they see a little bit of everything, which is great. This is probably the best training to do your own startup, IMHO.

Students and future entreprenurs
In the case of people who are still learning, the only thing you might have a great grasp on it part 1. You might be building a lot of useful things, and/or reading a ton of blogs, but without thinking too much about distribution and the business side of things. This is a GREAT start, and if you have enough years ahead of you, it’ll be a short while before you master all the other skills.

Thanks!
If you’ve read this far, thank you! :) And thanks to Noah for inviting me to write a blog. If you want to reach out to me, feel free to write me at voodoo [at] gmail [dot] com. I also have a blog at http://andrewchen.typepad.com.

PS. Get new updates/analysis on tech and startups

I write a high-quality, weekly newsletter covering what's happening in Silicon Valley, focused on startups, marketing, and mobile.

Views expressed in “content” (including posts, podcasts, videos) linked on this website or posted in social media and other platforms (collectively, “content distribution outlets”) are my own and are not the views of AH Capital Management, L.L.C. (“a16z”) or its respective affiliates. AH Capital Management is an investment adviser registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply any special skill or training. The posts are not directed to any investors or potential investors, and do not constitute an offer to sell -- or a solicitation of an offer to buy -- any securities, and may not be used or relied upon in evaluating the merits of any investment.

The content should not be construed as or relied upon in any manner as investment, legal, tax, or other advice. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Any charts provided here are for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Certain information contained in here has been obtained from third-party sources. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, I have not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. The content speaks only as of the date indicated.

Under no circumstances should any posts or other information provided on this website -- or on associated content distribution outlets -- be construed as an offer soliciting the purchase or sale of any security or interest in any pooled investment vehicle sponsored, discussed, or mentioned by a16z personnel. Nor should it be construed as an offer to provide investment advisory services; an offer to invest in an a16z-managed pooled investment vehicle will be made separately and only by means of the confidential offering documents of the specific pooled investment vehicles -- which should be read in their entirety, and only to those who, among other requirements, meet certain qualifications under federal securities laws. Such investors, defined as accredited investors and qualified purchasers, are generally deemed capable of evaluating the merits and risks of prospective investments and financial matters. There can be no assurances that a16z’s investment objectives will be achieved or investment strategies will be successful. Any investment in a vehicle managed by a16z involves a high degree of risk including the risk that the entire amount invested is lost. Any investments or portfolio companies mentioned, referred to, or described are not representative of all investments in vehicles managed by a16z and there can be no assurance that the investments will be profitable or that other investments made in the future will have similar characteristics or results. A list of investments made by funds managed by a16z is available at https://a16z.com/investments/. Excluded from this list are investments (and certain publicly traded cryptocurrencies/ digital assets) for which the issuer has not provided permission for a16z to disclose publicly. Past results of Andreessen Horowitz’s investments, pooled investment vehicles, or investment strategies are not necessarily indicative of future results. Please see https://a16z.com/disclosures for additional important information.